Showing posts with label islam. Show all posts
Showing posts with label islam. Show all posts

20100710

Mirror

-

* * * * *

"Muhammad in the Mirror of Islam"

By: Allamah Sayyid Mohammed Husayn Tabatabai

CONTENTS:

Islam and other Religions - The Shia view
The Islamic World View
A Brief Consideration of the Spiritual Path
The Superiority of Islam in the Belief of Divine Unity
Divine Sainthood

--


In the Name of God, Most Kind, Most Mersiful.


Islam and other Religions - The Shia view:

Islam is based on two realities: the blessed personality of the Prophet Muhammad, who was chosen exactly fourteen lunar centuries ago to deliver God's message and to be the leader of mankind; and the Koran, the Book from God which is the Prophet's enduring miracle and which contains God's words in the form of intellectual and practical teachings of a universal nature. These two realities must be considered as one of the most important factors in the development and perfection of human life, or rather, they are the most important factor to have manifested itself over the course of fourteen centuries in the faith and practice of hundreds of millions of men, extending its influence deep into every aspect of their society.
It is true that of the world's religions Islam is the youngest and that its followers are fewer in number than the sum of the adherents other faiths, yet Islam is possessed of certain distinguishing characteristics which sets it apart from other religious ways. For example, if we refer to the sacred books of Hinduism, and in particular the Veda, we see that the religious teachings presented there are almost exclusively of an ascetic nature and at the same time that they are directed towards a minority of the religion's followers. Thus, the majority of Hindus are excluded from deriving direct spiritual benefit from these sacred books.
Buddhism and also Christianity display with Hinduism the same exclusively ascetic outlook in their teachings. In the case of Christianity this is obvious from the four Gospels and the other basic religious texts. There are no practical injunctions or social laws and moreover philosophy and rational thought are looked upon with disfavor. The Divine Sacrifice and the remission of the sins of mankind are doctrines which reduce the relevance of injunctions concerned with this world.
Other religions have either ceased to draw men to themselves, such as Sabeanism and Manicheanism, or else are limited to a particular race of people, such as Judaism.
Thus it is only Islam which gives first importance to rationally demonstrable beliefs and positive individual and social injunctions, as, it is hoped, the present paper will make clear.


The Prime Importance of the Individual from the Point of View of Human Nature

Human nature seeks no more than to perpetuate as far as possible its own existence and to achieve its instinctive desires. If the first step man takes in his development is to form social groupings, and if he preserves these societies by acting in accordance with their laws-thus surrendering to the same extent a degree of his individual freedom-, it is in order that by depriving himself of one portion of his freedom he gain and benefit from another portion by being better able to provide for his innate requirements and his subsistence.
The first goal of creation is the happiness of the individual; the happiness of society follows upon this. In other words the purpose of creation is the perfection of human nature, and this perfection is realized in the being of the individual, not in the shape and form of society. Thus, man is directed towards the formation of social groupings to preserve the individual. For in order that he may realize the fundamental purpose of life-happiness and well-being-it is necessary that he should follow an orderly system of living, a system which inevitably must be social. He must eat, drink, clothe himself, sleep, rest, wed, bear offspring, secure his needs, and through the use of his mind provide the means of his own subsistence.


The Effect of the World View of the Individual upon his Activity

The form and characteristics of this orderly system which man follows in his life is dependent upon his conception of the nature of the Universe and of himself, who is an inseparable part of that Universe. Thus we see that a group of men do not admit the existence of a creator for the world and imagine that the world came into being accidentally and that man is only this material form which comes into existence at birth and ceases to exist at death. These men organize their way of life and rules for living with a view to the material needs of their ephemeral earthly existence, and this alone . They follow a path which can lead to no more than a limited material happiness and well-being.
On the other hand those who accept a creator for the universe and believe that the regulation of the affairs of men and of the world is in the hands of "the gods" do not consider man's life to be just this material existence; they organize their way of living in such a way as to attract the favor of the gods and keep away their anger, and in this manner to achieve happiness in life and remain safe from unpleasant occurrences resulting from gods' wrath.
Again, those who accept the Unity of God and believe that the Universe and all that is in it is governed by One God who is All-Wise and All-Powerful, and that man does not cease to exist at death but lives an eternal life, will organize their lives accordingly, that is, with an eye to assuring felicity in both worlds.
It is thus clear that "religion" is the organization of life, and that life lived according to a program is religion. Those who try to separate religion and life and claim that the first of these is only empty formalism are sadly mistaken. It is in view of this that Islam calls the path one follows in life "religion", while it calls the true way the "Straight Path" and the false way the "Deviated" or "Crooked Path". God says: "The curse of God is on evil doers, who hinder (men) from the path of God and would have it crooked, and who are disbelievers in the Last Day." (Koran, chapter 7).


The Islamic World View


The concept upon which the Prophet of Islam founded his religion is that all of existence has been created by the One God, and that every one of the parts of existence is directed by God towards the perfection and happiness peculiar to that part. Man also, who possesses eternal life, is directed towards the happiness and welfare peculiar to his nature; and this he gains by following the path shown to him by God.
The Holy Prophet addressed his message to natural man, that is, man endowed with human nature and God-given intelligence and will who is not tainted by superstition and blind belief. Such an individual with his God-given primordial nature has the innate capacity and ability to apprehend the above- described world view. With the slightest reminder he naturally understands that the world in its vastness and grandeur and its perfect arrangement and order is the creation of a transcendent Creator whose infinite Being is the source of every beauty and perfection and who is above all ugliness and evil. Such an individual understands that the creation of the world and its inhabitants was not without meaning and purpose; that the life of this world will be followed by another life, and that the good and bad actions of this world will not go unanswered for. And as a result he understands that there must be a way of life peculiarly suited to the needs of man which will enable him to live according to his own real nature.
Islam's choice of natural and primordial man as the object of the religious message has several basic results:

1. The Principle of Equality.

The Islamic teachings apply to all. There is no distinction between black and white, man and woman, noble and humble, rich and poor, king and beggar, strong and weak, eastern and western, learned and ignorant, old and young, or between those who are present and those who will come in the future, for all of these share human nature and that which it implies in common. Equality of this sort is limited to Islam; other ways, each in its own measure, have certain discriminatory principles. For example, Hinduism distinguishes fundamentally between Brahmins and non- Brahmins and between man and woman; in Judaism a distinction is made between the children of Israel and the Gentiles, and in Christianity between man and woman. As for secular social systems, in these there is a distinction between subjects of a country and foreigners. It is only Islam which considers humanity as one and has uprooted completely the principle of distinction and discrimination. "O mankind! Verily, We have created you male and female, and have made you nations and tribes that you may know one another. Lo! The noblest of you, in the sight of God, is the best in conduct." (chapter 49) "Lo! I suffer not the work of any worker, male or female, to be lost. You proceed one from another." (chapter 3) That is, male or female, you are all of the same human status.

2. The Principle of Realism.

In view of the fact that man is provided with the instinct of seeking reality and of discerning between the real and the unreal, the laws and injunctions laid down by Islam are based upon a correspondingly realistic view of things. This can be explained as follows: Although man in his natural activity is stimulated towards his vital goals by feelings and emotions, he in fact sets out after real goals, not illusion and fantasy. The newly born baby who cries in his hunger and reaches for his mother's breast in search of milk desires that which is milk in reality, not the illusion of milk; he cries from real hunger, not from fantasy and imagination. Every individual who strives in the way of achieving his own interests seeks his own real interests, not their mental concept. In the same manner when feelings and emotions present certain desires to man, and without being able to take into account his true best-interest stimulate him toward certain goals, it is the faculty of discrimination or reason which harnesses and modifies these emotions and shows to man that which is in reality the good and the evil and the rightness and the wrongness of his action.
It is reason, moreover, which forbids the sick person from eating harmful foods although he wishes to eat them; it is reason which prevents man from entering upon dangerous activities, hence depriving him of a large part of his freedom of action; it is reason which is man's single superiority over other animals, and his most important faculty for distinguishing the real from the illusory.
The laws and injunctions brought by the Prophet of Islam are based upon a realistic view of things, not upon the whims and fancies of men. That is to say that man must perform that action which is really and truly in his best interest even if it is against his fancy; and he must avoid that action which he feels like performing but which is not in conformity with his real interests. The case of the religious community is the same: it must accomplish what is truly in its best interest and what is in conformity with its felicity, even though this act may be contrary to its wishes; it must not perform that action which is the wish of the majority of its members but which is contrary to its true interest.
In the language of the Holy Koran that which is in conformity with reality or with man's true best interest is called "The Truth" (Haq). It is the single goal towards which man must direct his endeavour and after which he must strive. "After the Truth what is there saving error?" (chapter 10). "And if the Truth had followed their desires, verily the heavens and the earth and whosoever is therein had been corrupted" (chapter 23).
An almond nut which is placed in the ground under the necessary conditions will after a few days break its skin, and a green shoot will come forth from its kernel as well as a number of roots which are put forth in various directions; by way of the roots the shoot will take continuous nourishment from the ground and will constantly grow and develop until ultimately it becomes a fully grown almond tree with trunk, branches, leaves blossoms and fruit.
The sperm of an animal placed in the womb of the female of the species under particular circumstances will assume the form and shape peculiar to itself and by means of the activity peculiar to its species will day by day become larger and more complete until it reaches the limit of its perfection.
If we investigate in the same manner all of the creatures of the world one by one it will become perfectly obvious that for each of them there is a way peculiar to itself through which it reaches the limit of its own perfection, and that from the first day of its coming into being it is attracted towards its end. In its development it never goes astray nor does it change its direction, as if, for example, an almond shoot could develop into a horse or a horse could go to sleep one night and wake up the next morning an almond tree. Rather every creature is guided toward its final goal by means of creation itself, and in traversing this path of development it never falls into error.
The path which has been laid out for each creature leading to its final goal is one which is in conformity with the means and potentialities with which it was provided by its own nature. These means allow it to attract what is of benefit and repel what is harmful and threatens its existence. Chickens eat grain, sheep and cattle feed upon forage, and wolves, leopards and hawks hunt for game, for each is equipped with particular digestive systems which are proper only for particular nutritive substances. In the same way, birds defend themselves with their beaks, sheep and cattle with their horns, scorpions and bees with their stings, lions and leopards with their teeth and claws, and deer by flight, for the defensive equipment of each of them is just this. In summary, each of these creatures moves in its life towards a particular goal and end. It performs actions in which the equipment provided by its very existence guides it, and the nature of which this equipment determines.
This guidance and determination is the same general guidance and determination which the Koran has referred to and attributed to the Creator: "Our Lord is He who gave unto everything its nature, then guided it aright." (chapter 20) "Who creates, then sets disposition; who measures, then guides." (chapter 87).
Obviously, man also, who is one of the species of creation, is not an exception to this general rule. His natural disposition and character show to him the path which he should take in life, and point out and distinguish the duties and responsibilities which he must fulfill. "From what thing does he create him? From a drop of seed. He creates him and proportions him, then makes the way easy for him."
Meditation upon this and upon our previous discussion will show that the result of both of these discussions is the same, that is, that correct actions and deeds (those which are in conformity with man's true best interest)- which man must choose by means of his instinct of discerning between the real and the illusory-are the very same actions towards which the nature of man guides him, endowed as it is with its own peculiar equipment. It is thus that the way towards which the Holy Koran invites man, which it has named "the Religion of the Truth", which it also refers to as the natural and primordial religion, and attributes it to creation itself. "So set your purpose for religion as a man by nature upright, God’s nature, in which He hath created man. There is no changing the (nature) God's creation. That is the right religion”. "By a soul and Him who perfected it, and inspired it right and wrong. He is indeed successful who causes it to grow, and he is indeed a failure who debases it.”
From another point of view, since creation is the work of God and since every sort of beauty and appropriateness which is observable in it is the result of His Mercy, that which is appropriate to human nature inasmuch as it determines the actions which man must perform is called "the Will of God". (This is of course the Will of God inasmuch as it ordains laws, guides men in his actions, and holds him responsible for these actions; it is not the same as the Will of God inasmuch as it creates-which can never be disobeyed or violated.) Likewise the duties and rules which result from that which is appropriate to man's nature are called the commands and prohibitions of God. "The Lord brings to pass what He wills and chooses. They have no choice.”
Since the religion of Islam consists of duties and commands from God, the Creator, and since the person who follows its doctrinal and practical injunctions has submitted himself to the Will of God, in the language of the Holy Koran this religion is called "Islam" ("submission" or, "surrender" to God). "Lo! The religion with God is Islam”. "And whoever seeks a religion other than Submission (to God), it will not be accepted from him."

3. The Principle of Equilibrium, between the Material and the Spiritual

The third result of Islam's message being directed at natural man, a result which is indeed one of the great achievements of this religion, is that a middle way is taken between materiality and spirituality. This is in contrast to Judaism, which, as can be observed in its Holy Book, the Torah, is not concerned with spiritual matters, and with Christianity, which on the contrary-according to the explicit sayings of Jesus-is not concerned with the material life of this world. Other religions such as Hinduism and Buddhism and even Zoroastrianism, Manicheanism and Sabeanism, which to one degree or another are concerned with spiritual things, have separated the spiritual way from material life, to the extent that the connection between the two has been totally severed. It is only Islam which chooses the middle way and bases itself upon the foundation of primordial human nature. towards his God, and include expressions of servitude in the face of His Lordship, poverty and need in the face of His Wealth and Independence, lowliness in the face of His Grandeur, insignificance in the face of His Majesty and Glory, ignorance in the face of His Knowledge, incapacity in the face of His Power, and submission in the face of His Will. Moreover, to the extent possible these expressions have been given a social character, such as in the case of the groups which gather for the daily congregational prayers, the larger groups which meet for Friday prayers, and the still larger gathering which takes place at the time of the pilgrimage to Mecca.
A second portion of these injunctions concern duties which man has in social surroundings and in relation with his fellow man. Of course in these duties, which are the Islamic laws, the sense of responsibility towards God has been taken into account, for man must submit only to His Will (that is, the requirements of His creation). In other words, all actions must be performed in the shadow of the three basic principles of Islam: Divine Unity, Prophecy, and the Last Day. "Say: O People of the Book [Jews and Christians], Come to a common agreement between us and you - that we shall worship none but Almighty God, and that we shall ascribe no partners unto Him, and that none of us shall take others for lords beside God. And if they turn away, say to them: Bear witness that we Submit (to God)."
From the previous discussion it has become clear that in the religion of Islam the path to be followed in life has been ordered and arranged in such a way that man's social and material life resembles a cradle in which the spiritual life is nurtured. The inner spiritual light of the practicing Muslim is such that all of his individual and social actions contribute to purifying his soul and strengthening its radiance. Although outwardly he is with people, inwardly he is with God, and although he is in the midst of a crowd, he dwells in the spiritual retreat of the divine secret. At the same time that he is running here and there in pursuit of material goals, and is undergoing a series of events both bitter and sweet, pleasant and unpleasant, beautiful and ugly, and in general is involved in the events of the tumultuous external world, his heart is free and exists in a world of tranquility in which he sees the Face of God wherever he looks. “And where ever you turn, there is the Face of God.”.
A pious Muslim extends his spiritual life into every aspect of his material life. Wherever he is and whatever he is doing he is in contact with God. Everything with which he occupies himself in the material world is a mirror in which he sees God reflected. On the other hand, non-Muslims who turn towards the spiritual life imagine that their natural and every-day life is a veil between themselves and the Truth they are seeking. As a result they are forced to abandon normal life and to assume an unaccustomed manner of living in their quest after spiritual perfection. Whatever the advantages of such a way, from the point of view of a person who lives a normal life it is a difficult road to follow and one in which to persevere requires an extreme degree of will power. However, the person who follows the spiritual life according to the directives of Islam knows full well that such a way is easier than that of Islam, for such people, by abandoning every-day life, have taken the easy way out and have fled from the difficulty of continual vigil and effort. They have set a barrier in the road towards perfection which creation itself and the means it has put at man's disposal have prepared. Such men have set out on a path of their own fancy, and it is questionable whether they will ever reach the goal which creation has determined for them.
In addition, given that the world and all it contains are the creation of God and that the phenomena of the world, each according to the measure of its own existence, are signs of the Truth and mirrors displaying God, and given that man along with the various conditions which mark his primordial nature is one of these signs, then it is necessary that in the spiritual life (the way of knowledge of self and of God) God be recognized in every situation. All of these mirrors must be utilized in the acquisition of divine knowledge and in the contemplation of God's Beauty, for if this is not the case man will gain nothing more from his labors than an imperfect knowledge or a perfect ignorance.

4. Knowledge and Wisdom from the Point of view of Islam.

The person who has made a cursory study of the religions and creeds of the world will have no doubt that the dignity and honour which Islam has accorded to knowledge and wisdom and the extent to which it has encouraged their acquisition is unparalleled in any other religion or ideology, whether revealed or non-revealed. It is the Holy Koran which asks, "Are those who know equal to those who do not?", and which praises the exalted station of knowledge in the most eloquent manner. And it is the Holy Prophet who has said "The pursuit of knowledge is incumbent upon every Muslim, "Seek knowledge from the cradle to the grave", and, "Seek knowledge, even unto China." Again, it is the Holy Koran which commands its followers never to stray from the way of knowledge nor to follow what is only supposed or assumed, and never to accept without deliberation what passes before their sight or crosses their minds, for they will be responsible for their beliefs. "Follow not that where of which you have no knowledge. Lo! the hearing and the sight and the heart each will be questioned.” (chapter 17).
As has become clear Islam encourages its followers to acquire knowledge with all the powers at their disposal, and in this respect it has designated knowledge of religious jurisprudence or doctrinal sciences, and the injunctions of the religious law (sharia) as mandatory." And the believers should not all go out to fight [in the holy war]. Only a group should go forth, others may gain sound knowledge in religion.”
A point which must be kept in mind, is that the capacity of individuals for the comprehension of scientific and intellectual truth varies. There are people who have no talent for logical thought and who, with their simple minds, live in a surrounding of physical labour and on a level of purely material life, where there are others whose thought is logical and who by their very nature take a special joy in comprehending profound concepts and scientific theories. Still others have cut their attention from both thought and physical labour and, having a special aversion for the dark world of matter and its deceiving beauty and fleeting pleasures, find in themselves a particular attraction towards the transcendent world and a peculiar fascination for its lasting and infinite beauty, of which the beauty of this world is only the reflected image. Such men easily comprehend the verities and mysteries of the transcendent world by means of inner illumination.
It is with a view to this diversity, which is clearly visible among men, that Islam instructs each of these three groups in its own terms and language. One group it has taught by means of the external and formal aspect of religion and a second group by way of intellectual demonstration, while the third group it has instructed to struggle against the carnal soul and to purify the heart. In the same way, in the Koran God has struck a similitude about His Own utterances and expressions: "He sends down water from the sky, so that valleys flow according to their measure.". The Holy Prophet has said, "We prophets have been commanded to speak to men according to their level of intellect."
Those among its followers who have not the taste for rational demonstration and who would face the danger of error and deviation if they were to attempt to traverse this path, Islam has charged with no more than the measure of their ability, and beyond the three principles of religion (Divine Unity, Divine Prophhoot and the Last Judgement) it only instills them with simple practical injunctions such as command to do good and prohibitions from committing evil; this type of formulation is found in a great number of Koranic verses and in saying of the Prophet and the Shia Imams.
Of course in the case of the three principles of religion man in his primordial nature can engage in a simple form of rational demonstration, and hence he will have accepted nothing but definitely proven knowledge. And in fact this method provides him with rational proof of the remaining teachings and injunctions which he has accepted without rational demonstration, for the truth of the principle of prophecy proves in a definitive manner the validity of all of the saying which have reached us from the Prophet.
The way of rational demonstration-Islam teaches those people who are endowed with sound minds and who have the capacity to comprehend scientific theories and intellectual and logical arguments through logical and rational demonstration. In other words, it guides them towards that which their uncorrupted and reality-seeking primordial nature immediately perceives. It does not first impose upon them its doctrines and beliefs and then defend these by reasoning and proofs.
The Book and the Tradition, that is, the verses of the Holy Koran and the sayings of the Prophet and of the Shia Imams-which make clear the meaning and purpose of the Koranic verses-are full of this type of rational demonstration. In them the Islamic beliefs and doctrines are explained in detail by means of the simplest forms of expression and the most convincing proofs, and likewise, mention is made in them of the general and universal benefits and advantages of the Islamic laws and injunctions.
Obviously, we must not overlook the fact that the meaning of discussion and demonstration of the benefits and advantages of the Islamic laws and injunctions is not that if an individual Muslim or Islamic society in general does not understand a particular injunction, that injunction should be rejected. For as we have already mentioned, these laws were promulgated by means of prophecy, and the proof of the validity of prophecy is a summary proof of the validity of these laws, even if we do not possess the detailed reason for this.
The way of purification of the soul-The third group of men are those who are ready and eager to sever all material attachments and to turn their attention away from the deceiving adornments and illusory desires of this world. Such men are prepared to forget all that is other than God and to close their eyes to every beauty and ugliness and every sweet and bitter experience of this transient and illusory existence. Opening the eye of discernment 15
towards the eternal world, they are prepared to contemplate without the veil of materiality the radiance of the Majesty and Grandeur of God, to traverse the stages of human perfection which must be crossed upon leaving this fleeting life, and to enter into the Proximity of the Divine. With such men Islam converses secretly of the divine mysteries in a language which they alone understand, and thus it guides them from the depths of ignorance to the pinnacle of knowledge and wisdom.

A Possible Criticism and its Answer

A number of orientalists have said that Islamic mystical and metaphysical doctrines have been borrowed from those of India, for Islam in itself is no more than a series of extremely concrete and simple beliefs and sterile forms of worship. The succinct reply to these claims is provided nicely by the words of the poet: "O Sweet heart, the difficulty is that you're no judge of words."
We, of course, in our answer to this criticism, do not wish to defend Islam from the point of view of its mystics and engage in proving the validity and originality in the face of Indian mysticism of the various ways which they have traversed on the spiritual path. In the same way, in our discussion of rational demonstration we were not concerned with analyzing and proving the validity of all the books on philosophy written by Muslims, and in our discussion of the way of the formal aspects of religion we did not declare as correct the way of the generality of Muslims whatever it might be. Rather, our goal in this article is limited to a general survey of the original and genuine Islamic sources, that is, the Book and the Tradition, without concerning ourselves with agreeing or disagreeing with the activities and conduct of any particular one of the foregoing classes of men.
The claim of the above-mentioned orientalists is based upon the principle of evolution, according to which the development and perfection of a natural phenomena is explained in a scientific manner. This principle has been generalized to include every sort of happening in whatever sphere, even habits, customs and phenomena of a spiritual nature. Thus the root cause of every event is sought in preceding events. According to the same principle it has been said that Islamic laws were borrowed from those of the Romans and Islamic doctrines from the philosophical ideas of the Greeks.
These orientalists have been mistaken in their judgement in two respects. First, they have considered what is called "mystical intuition" to be of the same order as normal thought and hence they have imagined that the knowledge gained by purification of the soul is a system of poetical thoughts, much as if a poet with his overflowing and creative imagination and his eloquent means of expression could voice such concepts better than a mystic knower of the divine secrets. A similar mistake is made in the case of revelation, which is the celestial perception of prophets and the means of receiving divine sciences and laws. As a result, the basic source of Islamic doctrine and injunctions is represented as being Greek thought and Roman law. This mistake is perfectly obvious in the discussions carried on about prophecy and the "mode of thought" of prophets. Moreover, the words and utterances which have reached us from the prophets, whether their claim to prophethood be true or not openly contradict such opinions.
The second mistake is that, even if we accept the theory of evolution as proven and definitely established, this theory must not be taken as providing the reason for the manifestation of an instinctive drive. For, an instinct placed within a species' primordial nature at its creation will be manifested within each individual of that species (provided there be no external impediment), whether or not there is a precedent.
As a case in point it can be said that diversity in foodstuffs and the preparation of sophisticated cuisine was learned by the Arabs from the Persians, but it cannot be said that the Arabs learned how to eat from the Persians. Likewise, it can be said that democratic government with its manifold administrative organizations spread to the East from the West, but this cannot be said about the very art of forming a society and establishing a government.
In our previous discussion it became clear that the way of purification of the soul, that is, the spiritual life and mystical intuition, is innate within the nature of man; once awakened through the necessary groundwork and the removal of obstacles, it will direct man to enter upon the path of spiritual illumination. Hence, religion, which by its very nature is concerned to one degree or another with the transcendent and eternal world, cannot but cause
the appearance of certain among its followers, who, this hidden urge having been awakened within them, will sever all attachments with this fleeting world full of pain and hardship, and with the hope of absolute bliss and serenity will concern themselves with the eternal abode. And in practice also we see that in every one of the world's religions there exists a group enamored of the spiritual life and mystical way.
By comparing the presentation of spiritual matters in the basic texts of the world's religions it can be clearly observed that the texts of Islam have concerned themselves with the description of everlasting felicity and the external world more than the texts of other religions. Therefore, the appearance of the way of the purification of the soul within Islam is perfectly natural, without there being the need for any relationship as to its origins with India or with any other place. Furthermore, as history is there to prove, a large number of the companions of Ali (the cousin and son-in-law of the Prophet and the first Shia Imam) such as Salman, Kumayl, Rashid, Maytham and Uways were under his direct spiritual guidance and instruction -at a time when Islam had not yet reached India and when there could be no question of contact with Indian thought. The fact that the chains of spiritual initiation (silsilah) of practically all of the Sufi orders in Islam reach back to Ali further corroborates this point.

The Difference in Means of Expression between Islamic and other Mysticisms

The delicate and refined expressions of Islamic mystical doctrine in contrast to the formulation of other mysticisms, and especially to that of the Indians, has the advantage of elucidating mystical verities within the wrapping of formulations of a more general nature. Hence, everyone is able to profit from them, each in the measure of his understanding. Other mystical ways do not possess this distinction.
It is for this same reason that Islam has been saved from the harmful results, which have affected other religions, by presenting mystical truths openly and unambiguously. For example, in the case of Indian mysticism, if we study the Upanishads carefully, we will see that the doctrine presented there is a precise and extremely profound expression of the Unity of God, but at the same time that it is so bold and explicit that any one who refers to it who is not completely versed in mystical and metaphysical doctrine will consider its marvelously complete formulations as nothing but superstitious prattle, or at the very least he will interpret passages which express the Unity of God in the most sublime manner as being nothing but incarnationism, pantheism and idol worship.
This claim, moreover, is proved by the opinions which many orientalists who have specialized in Sanskrit have voiced concerning Indian mysticism; for after the tremendous amount of research which they have undertaken in the original Hindu and Buddhist texts they still consider Indian mystical doctrines as nothing but superstition, produced by the minds of men deprived of the advantages of life. And the basic reason for all such opinions on the part of orientalists is the explicitness and the shocking nature of the bold formulations of these texts.

Further Consideration of the Islamic Message

In the same way that God's creation has placed a particular kind of material life within the reach of mankind and has not discriminated among men but has equipped each of them with equal means, it has also placed the spiritual life, which is hidden behind the veil of material life, within the reach of all men. And in the same way that the perfection of the material life of man lies in the manifestation and actualization of all his positive and negative actions and deeds-which he performs by means of his body-so also creation has extended the perfection of the spiritual life to include all of those actions and deeds. In harmony with creation, Islam has considered the spiritual life to belong to all men and has made no distinction between them, and likewise it has extended the spiritual life to all the positive and negative aspects of men's lives. It invites men to accept the ties of social life and to act in a positive manner in traversing a determined path. In teaching this way it has had recourse to indications enclosed in the covering of normal and every-day expressions. This is because our verbal formulations are in case born of the thoughts of the generality of men. We use them in our social and material life in order to facilitate mutual understanding, and by means of them we exchange thoughts and mental concepts. Now mystical and contemplative comprehension, which is rarer than the elixir of life and which throughout history has never found general acceptance, is something completely different from normal human expression. The person who wants to formulate into concepts the knowledge gained through intuitive and mystical comprehension is like the person who tries to describe by means of words the colors of the rainbow to one blind from birth. And the person who puts contemplative and mystical insights into the mold of words is exactly like the person who carries water from place to place with a sieve.
It is for this reason that Islam has had recourse to symbols and intimations in expressing mystical truths, and has thus remained untouched by the misfortunes which have overtaken other religions.


A Brief Consideration of the Spiritual Path

It may possibly be imagined that the claim that Islam has expounded the mystical way by means of intimations and symbols is unfounded and amounts to chasing false ghosts. However, sufficient meditation upon Islamic teachings and formulations, and a weighing of these against the agitated and ecstatic states of the Islamic mystics, will prove the opposite and will show that hidden within themselves and by allusion these teachings elucidate all of the stages of perfection which are traversed on the mystical way, although a true and detailed comprehension of these states is only possible through mystical intuition.
The travellers on the spiritual path, who as a result of their natural and primordial readiness have surrendered their hearts to the infinite Beauty and Perfection of the Truth, worship God only out of love, not out of hope for reward or fear of punishment, for to worship Him in order to gain Paradise or to avoid hell is in fact to worship that very reward and punishment in place of God.
As a result of the divine attraction which has engulfed their hearts, and more particularly as a result of having seen that God has revealed the verse "Therefore, remember Me, I will remember you." and hundreds of other Koranic verses where the remembrance of God is mentioned. Where ever and in whatever state they happen to be the mystic travellers are occupied with His remembrance: “Such as remember God, standing, sitting and reclining", and, when they hear the messages of the Beloved: "Lo! in the heavens and the earth are Signs for believers", "And there is not a thing but hymns His praise." "And where ever your turn, there is the Face of God.”
They understand that all existent things are mirrors, each displaying the unique Beauty of the Truth in accordance with the possibilities of its own being. Other than their quality of being mirrors they have no existence in themselves. Hence such men look to every phenomenon with love and eagerness and have no object other than to contemplate the Beauty of God.
And when they hear God's messages "O you who believe! You have charge of your own souls. He who is lost cannot injure you if you are rightly guided”, and "Verily, you O man are working towards your Lord a work which you will meet (with Him)." They understand that by the nature of creation itself they are bound within the framework of their own souls, and other than the way of their souls there is no road open to them to reach God. Whatever they see or find in the expansiveness of the world they see and find in themselves. It is here that man understands that in fact he is cut off from all places and things and other than he himself and his God there is no one else. Even if such a person is in the midst of a hundred thousand people he is alone, and if others see him in the midst of a crowd, he sees himself in a spiritual retreat far away from everyone else, no one being with him but God. It is then that he looks at himself and sees all things within himself, and he understands that he himself is also only a mirror in which the unique Beauty of God is manifested, and that he has nothing but God. When he has remembered God in this fashion and has cleansed his heart and emptied it of vanity and frivolity, the remembrance of God becomes firmly fixed within his soul and he enters among the ranks of the people of Certainty (Al-Yaqeen) and God's promise. "And serve your Lord till the certainty comes upon you." The doors of the kingdom of the heavens and the earth open to him and he sees that all things are possessed absolutely by God. "Thus did We show Abraham the kingdom of the heavens and the earth that he might be of those possessing certainty."
The person endowed with such a vision will behold the three stages of Divine Unity. First the Unity of God in His Acts will be revealed to him. He will see with certainty that it is God who directs the Universe and all that it contains, and that the innumerable causes and agents which are at work in the world, whether theirs be the activity of free will or of necessity, are all painted upon the canvass of creation by His all-powerful Hand. Cause and effect and the relationship between the two-each is brought into being and executed by the One. "And to God belongs the Sovereignty of the heavens and the earth.".
Secondly the Unity of God's Names and Qualities will be disclosed to him and he will see without intermediary that every quality of perfection which appears in the world, and likewise every quality of beauty and of majesty, whether life, knowledge, power, might, grandeur or whatever, is a glimmer from the infinite Source of Light which is the Truth, and that these qualities shine forth through the variegated windows which are the existences of things with the distinctions they possess. "God's are the fairest names.”.
Finally in the third stage of Divine Unity he will behold that all of these varied qualities are the manifestations of an infinite Essence, and that in reality each of them is identical with every other and all are identical with the Essence Itself. "Say: God is the Creator of all things, and He is the One, the Almighty."


The Superiority of Islam in the Belief of Divine Unity

The above are the three stages which the lovers of the Truth in the various religions of the world pass through. When they begin their travel on the way of spiritual perfection they take these stages to be their final goal. Islam, however, does not limit itself to these stages but delineates a goal for its followers which is even higher and which surpasses the goal formulated in the text of any other religion. For, it does not stop at negating all limitations from God and considering Him as infinite and transcendent over all qualification, but it goes so far as to negate from Him this very quality of Infinity (since every quality [even that of Infinity] cannot help but "qualify" and so limit that to which it is attributed.) Hence the Divine Essence is considered as transcending all names and designations and even as transcending this very description. The sixth Shia Imam, Jafar Al Sadiq, according to a tradition which is quoted by Kulayni in the book Usul Al Kafi, has deduced this stage from the following verse of the Holy Koran: "Say: Call God, or call the Beneficient, unto which ever you call cry (it is the same) . His are the most beautiful names." However, since further elucidation of this doctrine would mean that we must enter a philosophical discussion which is not in keeping with the nature of the present article, for the present we must leave this aside.


Divine Sainthood

The followers of the path towards perfection from the beginning of their journey until the point where they reach final peace witness a great deal which must remain hidden from the eyes and hearts of the earth-bound inhabitants of the material world, and a consideration of these states and stations would be beyond the scope of the present article. What is important here is the question of Sainthood in God (Wilayat-a-Elahi).
When the travellers on the spiritual path reach the stage of Divine Unity and enter into the proximity of God, they let go totally of what they had possessed up to that time, for they have come to know that everything belongs to God. They give up the false claim of "owning" things and of being independent in this ownership. It is then that an indescribable tranquility and repose comes over them and they are released absolutely from all pain, fear and sorrow. "Lo! those who say: Our Lord is God, and afterward are upright, the angels descend upon them saying: Fear not nor grieve, but hear good tidings of the paradise which you are promised. We are your protecting friends in the life of the world and in the Hereafter." “Lo! verily the friends (saints) of God are those on whom is no fear nor grief (regrets)." (Koran, chapter 10).
It is at this point that worldly joys, sorrows, successes and failures appear to them as all the same, and having found a new existence they view the world and all that it contains in a new light. His he who was dead and We have raised him unto life, and set for him a light wherein he walks among men, as him whose similitude is in utter darkness?". And in the end they and everything they possess belongs to God, and God to them: 'Whoso is near to God, God is close to him."

Conclusion

From our discussion it has become clear that the spiritual life in Islam is wider in its scope and more profound in its depth than what is found in other religions, for, as we have explained, Islam in its breadth has laid down detailed guidelines for all of the possible situations of human existence, whether as regards this world or the next; and in its upward flight and its depth it aims at a goal beyond that of other creeds.

-- THE END --

* * * * *

-

Gnosis and Wisdom

* * * *

"Islamic Gnosis and Wisdom"

By: Ayatollah Mohammed Taqi Misbah Yazdi


Contents:

Introduction
Gnosis in the Islamic World
Concepts of Gnosis, Sufism, Wisdom and Philosophy
Originality of Islamic Gnosis
Gnosis and Intelelct
Gnosis and Religious Law (Tariqa and Sharia)

--

Introduction

In the Name of God, the Kind, the Merciful.

In the cosmic realm, human beings are like balls
released into space which have within them a hidden
potential energy for flight into an infinitely sublime
world. But the gravitational attraction of worldly
pleasures draws them toward the depths of the material
world, as a result of which they fall and become
degenerate; and the selfish tendencies and Satanic
temptations which have become embodied in
materialistic civilizations and cultures increase the
speed of their downfall. Amidst all this, there are a
few individuals and groups of people the eyes of whose
hearts are open to spiritual truths and the ears of
whose souls have become familiar with divine messages
who have the resolution to turn aside from the
pollution of their animalistic desires, who open their
wings to the illuminated horizon of the angelic domain
and in the course of their evolution they begin an
ascent to the origin of all beauties, splendours,
powers, and raptures and the infinite source of
perfections, and in a word, ascend toward God. Like
balls which have bounced down to the ground, they are
disillusioned with the dead?end of materialism and
once again, with the same speed with which they
descended, they move in the opposite direction and
rise toward the sublime world. It is quite likely that
this process will recur repeatedly

This reaction may be well observed, nowadays, among
groups of people who have become disillusioned with
corrupt Western culture and who feel within themselves
a great thirst and longing for spiritual values, and
wander to and fro in order to find the fountainhead of
this lucid water. But, alas, most of them fall into
the traps laid by sorcerers who in place of the nectar
of gnosis pour the poison of perdition down their
throats. They lead them from pitfall to abyss, and
through a rear door to the realm of ruin and
destruction.

The centrifugal motion of materialistic culture and
the turn back toward spiritual culture is not merely
restricted to individual tendencies. We are now
witnessing movements toward Islam in all corners of
the world, even in the most polluted and corrupt of
afflicted lands. These movements have been accelerated
by a great Islamic revolution led by a prominent
gnostic, who, taking advantage of the flourishing
talents of the people, was able to gain victory over
the Satanic forces in the rays of the lights of
Islamic teachings. Despite the great obstacles put in
its way on all sides, it still gallops forward. But,
although this is not the first time that a divine man
and gnostic of the Lord has undertaken the leadership
of a popular movement, it is not easy to find another
example with such scope and depth and with such
firmness and stability.

In any case, this phenomenon, in turn, also can be a
very strong motive for the investigation of the role
of spiritual tendencies, especially the role of
Islamic gnosis, in the positive and desirable changes
in the lives of human beings.


Gnosis in the Islamic World

From antiquity, in the Islamic world there have been
tendencies by the names of gnosis (irfan) and sufism
(tasawwuf), and from the 10th-14th centuries they
reached their summit in many countries such as Iran
and Turkey. Today, there are various sufi sects all
over the world. Similar tendencies also may be found
among the followers of the other religions.
Considering this common aspect, it is natural for the
question to be raised as to whether there really is
any such thing as Islamic gnosis to be found in Islam,
or whether Muslims have taken this from others, so
that what is called Islamic gnosis is really the
gnosis of Muslims, not a truly Islamic gnosis. If
there is such a thing as gnosis in Islam, is this the
very thing which currently exists among Muslims, or
has it been subjected to changes?

In answering these questions, some have absolutely
denied the existence of gnosis in Islam and have
regarded it as heretical innovation to be repudiated.
Others consider it to have come from outside the
context of Islam, while holding it to be compatible
with it. In this line, some have said that sufism is
an acceptable innovation in Islam, like monasticism in
Christianity. In this regard, the Glorious Holy Koran
states:

And as for monasticism, they invented it themselves;
We did not prescribe it for them, except for seeking
the pleasure of God. (57:27)

Finally, there is a group who consider gnosis to be
not only a part of Islam, but the kernel and spirit of
it which comes from the Holy Koran and prophetic
sunnah, just as the other parts of Islam. It is not
that it was adapted from other schools of thought and
trends, and the aspects common to gnosis in Islam and
other religions is no reason to hold that Islamic
gnosis was derived from them, just as the similarities
between the religious law (sharia) of Islam and the
heavenly religious laws of the previous religions does
not mean that the former was derived from the latter.

We approve of the last response to the question, and
we add that the assertion of the originality of
Islamic gnosis is not to condone whatever has been
called gnosis or sufism in Islam. Likewise, it is not
just any sort of creed or conduct found among groups
related to Islam that can be considered truly Islamic
beliefs and practices; otherwise, Islam would
necessarily be a contradictory set of beliefs with a
conflicting set of values, or there would be
conflicting and contradictory Islams! In any case,
with our admission of the originality of Islamic
gnosis, a gnosis whose highest degree was reached by
the Noble Prophet, may the Peace and Blessings of God
Almighty be upon him and his kinfolk, and his true
successors, we do not deny the existence of foreign
elements among the Muslim gnostics and sufis. Many of
the views and manners of behaviour of the sufi orders
are disputable.


The Concepts of Gnosis, Sufism, Wisdom and Philosophy

Before explaining the originality of Islamic gnosis,
in order to avoid confusion and misunderstanding it is
appropriate here to give an explanation of the terms
gnosis (irfan) and sufism.

The term gnosis, like another term of the same family,
gnosticism, literally means knowledge, but its
technical meaning is specific to knowledge of a
certain kind which can be achieved neither through the
senses nor experience, nor through reason nor
narration, but rather is acquired by inner witnessings
and interior unveilings. Then, these are generalized
to some propositions which describe these witnessings
and unveilings. Considering the fact that the
acquisition of such witnessings and unveilings which
depend on special exercises and spiritual discipline
are also called gnosis, it is known with the
qualification of practical, i.e., as practical gnosis, or
the manner of spiritual journeying, just as the
propositions which describe the witnessings are called
theoretical gnosis, and also, like the Philosophy of
Illumination is mixed to some extent with
rational argumentation.

[Notes: The Philosophy of illumination was formulated
by Shihab al-Din Yahya Sohravardi (1153?1191).]

The expression sufism, which, according to the most
likely possibility, is derived from the word suf
(wool), meaning wearing woolen garments, which
symbolizes the hard life far from comforts and
hedonism, is more appropriately used for practical
gnosis, as the term gnosis is more appropriate to
theoretical gnosis. In this way, in the realm of
gnosis, at least three elements can be identified. One
is the specific practical instructions which are
alleged to lead man to intuitive and interior gnosis
and conscious knowledge by presence related to God,
the Exalted, and the Most Beautiful Names and His
sublime attributes and their manifestations. The
second is the specific spiritual and psychic states
and traits of character, and ultimately, the
unveilings and witnessings achieved by the wayfarer.
The third is the propositions and statements
indicating these intuitive direct findings, and even
for those who personally have not travelled the pant
of practical gnosis, can be more or less understood,
although finding their truth and essence is specific
to the true gnostics.

By attending to these explanations it becomes clear
that the true gnostic is the one who follows a
specific practical programme and attains an intuitive
and direct gnosis of God, the Exalted, and His
attributes and actions. Theoretical gnosis is, in
fact, an account and interpretation of this gnosis,
which, naturally, has many shortcomings. If we are not
very exact about the terminology and expand its scope
we can use the term gnosis for all spiritual
journeying (wayfaring), which is undertaken to find
the truth and attain felicity, as well as the
resulting spiritual states and witnessings. In this
way, gnosis will include even the kinds of gnosis
found in Buddhism and Hinduism and the gnosis of some
of the tribes of Siberia and the native tribes of
Africa, just as the term religion may be applied, with
the same sort of extended meaning to Buddhism,
totemism, and the like.

Here it is appropriate to indicate the concepts of
wisdom and philosophy, too.

The expression “wisdom”, which is an originally Arabic
word, means a firm and certain gnosis (enlightment),
and it is often applied to practical gnosis, as the
sense in which it is used in the Glorious Koran
(17:39). However, in current terminology it has the
meaning of divine philosophy as well as practical
philosophy and the science of ethics, and in ethics
itself it is used in the sense of a trait of the soul
related to the use of reason, and as the mean between
the extremes of cunning and stupidity. In any case, it
is not applied to atheistic philosophies or
skepticism, to the contrary of philosophy which is
derived from Greek roots meaning any intellectual or
rational efforts to understand the problems of all
existence, even if this leads to the rejection of
certain and established gnosis, or even the rejection
of objective existence.


The Originality of Islamic Gnosis

Anyone who attends carefully to the verses of the
Glorious Koran, the words of the Noble Prophet, and
the pure people of his household, may the Blessings of
God Almighty be upon them, all of them, without a doubt
will be able to find many sublime and profound
subjects in the realm of theoretical gnosis, as well
as numerous prescriptions and practical instructions
in relation to the spiritual wayfaring of the gnostic.
For example, we can refer to the verses related to the
unicity of the divine essence, attributes and actions
in chapter of Tawhid as well as the beginning of
chapter of al?Hadid, and the last verses in chapter of
al Hashr, and likewise the verses indicating the
divine presence throughout the world of being, and His
comprehension over all existents, and the existential
glorification and prostrations of all creatures for
God, the Exalted.

Likewise, there are verses which include special
prescriptions and manners which can be called the way
of Islamic spiritual wayfaring, such as the verses
pertaining to contemplation and meditation, constant
remembrance and attention, rising in the pre?dawn
hours and remaining awake at night, fasting, prolonged
prostrations and glorifications during nights,
humility and resignation, crying and falling down when
reciting and listening to the verses of the Holy
Koran, sincerity in worship, and the performance of
good deeds out of love and affection toward God in
order to achieve nearness to Him and His satisfaction,
as well as verses pertaining to trust in God, divine
pleasure, and submission before the Lord.

The points which can be found among the narrations
attributed to the Noble Prophet and Pure Imams, may
God Almighty bless all of them, and in their
supplications and intimate devotions related to the
above topics are uncountable.

In view of these explicit verses and dear explications
of the Noble Prophet and his immaculate household, May
God's infinite blessings be showered upon them, two
groups have gone to opposite extremes. One group of
narrow minded and superficial people give a trivial
and simple meaning to these verses, and even consider
God as having mutable states and physical ascent and
descent, and they empty the verses and narrations of
their noble and sublime contents. These are the sort
of people who generally reject the existence of
anything by the name of gnosis in the Islamic texts.

Another group under the influence of various social
factors have discovered and accepted some strange
foreign elements from others, as a result of which
they have come to believe things which one cannot
consider to originate from religious texts and the
contents of the divine Book and Sunnah. Rather, some
of them might be in opposition to the explicit texts
which are not capable of exoteric interpretation.
Likewise, regarding practice, they have invented their
own rites and customs, on the one hand, or have
borrowed them from non?Islamic sects. On the other
hand, they believe in the suspension of duties for the
accomplished gnostic.

Of course, those who have an exceptionally favourable
opinion of all gnostics and sufis have given excuses
and interpretations for all of these issues. But it is
fair to say that at least some of these contentions do
not have an acceptable justification, and we should
not be so over impressed with the scholarly and
spiritual greatness of some figures that we accept
whatever they say or write with closed eyes and ears
and confirm them, and deny others any right to
criticize and inquire into their works. Of course, it
is clear that the acceptance of the right to criticize
does not mean to condone unrefined or ill considered
judgments, or the unfair expression of bias, nor the
failure to pay due heed to positive and valuable
points. In any case, one should seek what is right and
true, and travel the way of justice and fairness and
avoid extreme and unreasonable optimism and pessimism
and seek help from God to recognize the truth and to
be persistent in the way of the Truth.

It is self?evident that to observe all the issues
pertaining to gnosis, sufism, wisdom and philosophy
and their interrelations and each of their relations
with Islam is not a task to be performed within the
confines of a single article. Thus, considering the
summary nature of the remarks, we shall be concerned
with the most significant points, and postpone further
investigation to the occasion of more extensive
discussion.


Gnosis and Intellect

One of the fundamental problems which is a matter of
contention between the supporters and opponents of
gnosis is whether reason can make any judgment about
what is given through gnosis, which is supposedly
acquired by interior unveilings and witnessings, or
whether, for example, reason can refute some of them
or not. The answer to this question is important with
regard to the fact that many gnostics make assertions
which cannot be given any rational explanation. They
claim that they discovered these things through the
esoteric way, and that reason does not have the
capacity to understand them, and naturally, that
reason thus has no right to refute or reject them.

The most important subject of this kind of controversy
is that of the unity of existence (wahdat al-wujud),
which has been propounded in various forms. One is
that, basically, there is nothing, has been nothing
and shall be nothing but God, the Exalted. Whatever
has been called other than Him, is said to be nothing
more than illusions and fantasies. Another form of
this proposition is that nothing exists outside the
essence of God or outside the vessel of His knowledge.
In this way, a sort of multiplicity in oneness may be
accepted. Another form of this claim, which is more
prevalent, is that the wayfarer at the end of his
journey, reaches the station of annihilation (complete
enlightment or fana), and nothing remains of him save
a name. Finally, the most moderate form of the claim
is that the wayfarer reaches a station in which he
sees nothing but God, and all things fade away into
God. In more exact terminology, he witnesses the
fading of all things into the existence of God, the
Exalted, like the fading of a weak light before the
light of the sun.

In such cases, the opponents generally take advantage
of rational arguments, and the proponents eventually
say that these sorts of matters transcend the limits
of reason. In this way they shirk the burden of the
rational explanation of their claims. Considering
these developments, this basic question will be posed:
Are there truths about which reason is incapable of
comprehending and has no right to reject?

What may be said in summary here is that although
reason is concerned with concepts and the function of
reason is not to recognize the truth of the objective
existence or origin of any objective thing, let alone
the divine exalted existence, but the positive and
negative judgments of reason, when they are
self-evident or may lead to self-evidence, are
undeniable and through concepts may be applied to
objective things. The assumption of the error of such
judgments involves contradiction. In other words,
although the function of reason is not knowledge of
the origins of existence, with the above mentioned
qualifications, there can be no doubt about the
validity of judgments about phenomena.

As for the issue of the unity of existence, it must be
said that the denial of existence of things other than
God and the absolute denial of multiplicity not only
imply the denial of the validity of the judgments of
reason, but also involve the denial of the validity of
knowledge by presence belonging to the active and
passive aspects of the soul. In this way, how can we
hold that witnessings and unveilings have any
validity, regarding the fact that the best evidence
for their validity is their being present to
consciousness? So, the unity of existence, on this
interpretation, is not acceptable at all. However, we
may consider an acceptable interpretation which is
propounded in Transcendent Philosophy from which
it is obtained that the existence of creatures in
relation to God, the Exalted, is a relative and
dependent existence, and to be precise it may be said
that they are the very relation and dependence, and
they have no independence of their own. That which is
discovered by the gnostic is this very denial of the
independence of other things [than God], which they
call the denial of their real existence.

[Note: Transcendent philosophy refers to the philosophy of
Sadr al-Din Shirazi, known as Mulla Sadra (1640).]

Here the question may be posed in another form: Can we
consider the judgment of reason prior to intuition and
unveiling? In reply, it should be said that pure
knowledge by presence is in truth the discovery of
reality itself. Thus, it is irrefutable. However,
knowledge by presence is usually accompanied by a
subjective interpretation in such a way that any
distinction between them requires great care. These
subjective interpretations which involve conceptual
knowledge, are fallible. What are rejected by rational
proofs are incorrect subjective interpretations of
observations and knowledge by pretence, not the
objects of knowledge by presence themselves. In the
case of the unity of existence, that which is realized
through witnessings is restricted to the independent
existence of God, the Exalted, which due to
inattention is called true existence, according to
which true existence is denied of other existents.

It is worth mentioning that the great Islamic gnostics
have explicitly claimed that some unveilings are
Satanic, invalid, and may be recognized through some
evidence, and ultimately may be distinguished from
others by placing them under the scrutiny of rational
certain arguments, the God’s Book and the Practices of
Divine Messenger.

It is clear that an investigation into all the kinds
of unveilings and witnessings and the types of
knowledge by presence and the ways in which they are
qualitatively reflected in the mind, the causes for
the incorrectness of some subjective interpretations
and the way to distinguish the correct from the
incorrect, are beyond the scope of this article.


Gnosis and Religious Law - (Tariqa and Sharia)

Another important problem worthy of consideration at the end
of this article is the relation between practical
gnosis and the precepts of religious law, or the
relation between Gnostic Path and God’s Law. A group
has imagined that practical gnosis is an independent
way to discover truths, to be used without regard to
religious law, and that Islam either corroborates it
(by acceptable innovation) or; at the very least,
poses no obstacle to it. And they have continued in
this direction to the point of holding that
basically, they considered it to be unnecessary to be
committed to any religion in order to reach gnostic
stations, and others have considered commitment to any
one of the religions, and in a more moderate form,
commitment to one of the divine religions, to be
sufficient.

However, from an Islamic point of view, gnostic
spiritual wayfaring is not along a way independent of
and aside from that of religious law; rather it is a
more exact and subtle part of it. If we restrict the
term God’s Law to the outward precepts, it must be
said that Gnostic Path is along with God’s Law, or in
its interior, and it may only be realized with the
observation of the precepts of God’s Law. For example,
God’s Law determines the precepts for the ritual
prayer; and Gnostic Path undertakes the ways of
concentration and the presence of the heart in prayer;
and the conditions for the perfection of worship. In
God’s Law the performance of worship in order to avoid
divine chastisement and to reach the blessings of
heaven is sufficient. However, gnosis emphasizes the
purification of intentions of everything other than
God. This is what is known in the language of the Holy
Family, Peace be upon them, as "the worship of the
free." Likewise, idolatry according to God’s Law is
exoteric idolatry by worshipping idols and the like;
however, in Gnostic Path there are more precise types
of hidden idolatry and levels of hiddenness. Having
any hope in anything other than God, fear of other
than God, seeking the help of other than God, and love
for other than Him, if all of these are taken as
fundamental and independent, and not based on
obedience to the divine commands, they will be
considered kinds of idolatry.

Therefore, all kinds of innovations in religion and
arbitrary rites are not only undesirable but may be
obstacles to the achievement of true gnosis, let alone
the use of things which have been explicitly and
definitely prohibited and forbidden. Although it may
be the case that some works may bring about transient
so-called gnostic states, they do not have a good
result. They may be a Satanic trap for ultimate
downfall, and we should not be deceived by them. It is
to be concluded that the way of Truth is the one that
God, the Exalted, has stated:

And what is there after the truth but error? (10:32)

And Peace be upon those who follow the Guidance.

-- The End --

* * * *

Presented by FMB on the occasion of Ashura 1430.
-

20090127

Iqbal the Poet

--

* * *


“Iqbal: The Poet Philosopher of Islamic Resurgence“

By: Ayatollah Sayyid Ali Khamanei, the supereme leader of Iran


--

Introduction

I should admit candidly that today when I see that our country is holding a seminar for paying tribute to our beloved Iqbal, I am obliged to feel that this day would prove to be one of the most memorable and exciting days of my life. That luminous spark that washed out from our hearts the darkness of the days of suffocation and repression (through his impressions, poetry, counsel and teachings) and projected a bright picture of the. future before our eyes, is now transformed into a bright torch to have attracted the attention of our people.

Our people who were the first foreign addressees of Iqbal were unfortunately very late to recognize him. The particular conditions in our country, especially the political domination of the colonialist powers during the last years of Iqbal's life in his favourite country, Iran, never allowed Iqbal to visit this country. This great poet of Persian language, who composed most of his poetry in Persian and not in his own mother tongue, could never breathe in his dear and desired climes. Not only that Iqbal never came to Iran, but the same politics with which Iqbal was at war throughout his life did not allow his ideas, his ideology and his teachings to reach the ears of the Iranian people, who were ever eager to receive his message. I have an answer to this question as to why Iqbal did not come to Iran.

At that time, when Iqbal was at the pinnacle of his fame and glory and was known all over the Subcontinent and all the renowned universities of the world recognized him as a great thinker, philosopher, scholar, humanist and sociologist (of course none of these titles corresponded to the title by which Iqbal desired to be known), in our country the politicians who ruled the country could not tolerate Iqbal and his ideas in any way. For this very reason he was never invited to Iran and the ground for his visit to this country was not prepared. Not only were none of his books published for years in Iran, even the titles of his books remained unknown to us. During the days when the literary works and culture alien to both the Iranians and Muslims were flooding this country like a devastating deluge, not a single poem or work of Iqbal was allowed to catch the public eye. Today the Islamic Republic (i.e. the embodiment of Iqbal's dream) has been established here, Iqbal, whose heart ached to see the Muslim people having lost their human and Islamic personality, and who viewed their loss of identity and spiritual poverty as the greatest danger to their existence and tried with all the power at his disposal to uproot this vicious weed from the human soul in general and from the inner being of the people of the East in particular and. especially the Muslims, had he been alive today, he could have seen a nation standing on its feet, infused with the rich Islamic spirit and drawing upon the inexhaustible reservoirs of Islamic heritage, a nation which has become self-sufficient and has discarded all the glittering Western ornaments and is marching ahead courageously, determining its own targets and moving to attain them, advancing with the frenzy of a lover, and has not imprisoned itself within the walls of nationalism and racialism. I am glad to have this opportunity (though for a brief time) to introduce to our people this great figure, a great thinker, a great reformer of our age, a revolutionary and an unrelenting warrior. I would, of course, be pleased if my presence in this function be free from all formalities, so that, firstly, I may enjoy with satisfaction this commemorative ceremony and, secondly, I may be given an opportunity to give vent to a fraction of my emotions about Iqbal before the audience. I request the brothers and sisters to allow me to speak frankly like a person who for years had been a follower of Iqbal and has lived emotionally in his company, so that to some extent I can give him what is due to him on behalf of myself. Iqbal is one of the eminent personalities in the history of Islam. His is such a profound and sublime personality that it cannot be described and measured by only one dimension of his life. Iqbal was a scholar and a philosopher, but at the same time other dimensions of his life are also so bright that if we consider him to be just a philosopher and a scholar, we feel that we have belittled him. Undoubtedly Iqbal is a great poet and is reckoned among the greatest. Those who know Urdu very well and have written about Iqbal's Urdu poetry maintain that Iqbal's Urdu poems are among the best in Urdu. Of course this may not be a great tribute to him as the poetic tradition of Urdu is not so rich. But it cannot be disputed that his Urdu poetry made a great impact ors large numbers of people, on Hindus and Muslims equally, living in the Subcontinent during the early decades of the twentieth century, and motivated them to participate in the struggle (for freedom) that was reaching its climax. In his mathnawi (a long poem consisting of rhymed couplets) Asrar-e khudi (The Secrets of the Self), he refers to this point:

The gardener tested the force of my speech.
He sawed a verse of mine and could reap a sword from it.



I infer from these lines that he had been composing his Urdu poetry for quite a long time and was known to all Urdu-knowing people of the Subcontinent . But in my view Iqbal's Persian poetry is to be regarded as one of the miracles of poetry. We have a large number of non-Persian-speaking poets in the history of our literature, but I cannot point out any of them whose poetry possesses the qualities of Iqbal's Persian poetry. Iqbal was not acquainted with Persian idiom, as he spoke Urdu at home and talked to his friends in Urdu or English. He did not know the rules of Persian prose writing. A specimen of Iqbil's Persian prose is available to us in his prefatory note to his mathnawi Rumuz-e bikhudi (The Secrets of the Selflessness) and Asrar-e khudi (The Secrets of the Self). If you read them you will see that it is hard for the people whose mother tongue is Persian to understand it. Iqbal never studied Persian at any stage in a school or college during the years of his childhood or youth. In his father's house he used to speak Urdu. Iqbal chose the Persian language as his medium of literary expression only for the reason that he felt that his ideas and themes could not be effectively expressed in the Urdu language. As such he was attracted towards Persian and he studied the collections of the Persian poets like Sa'di, Hafiz, and Mawlawi as well as the Persian poets who wrote in Indian style like `Urfi, Naziri Nishaburi and others. In spite of not having tasted the Persian way of life, never living in the cradle of Persian culture, and never having any direct association with it, he cast with great mastery the most delicate, the most subtle and radically new philosophical themes into the mould of Persian poetry, some of which are unsurpassable yet. In my view this is what can be explained as his poetic genius. When you compare his poetical works with those of other non-Iranian poets who wrote poetry in Persian, you will realize the greatness of Iqbal. Some of the ideas that he has expressed with ease in one couplet, if one tries to render them into prose it will take a long time and great deal of effort to do-so. It is not an easy job even for us whose mother tongue is Persian.


Iqbals Poetry as his Introduction

There can be no better introduction of Iqbal than his poetry. In no other way we can introduce Iqbal more truly. Some of the Persian poems of Iqbal are the most sublime pieces of Persian poetry. Iqbal's verses are in different styles, in Indian style, in `Iraqi style, in Khurasani style, and in various poetic forms, like mathnawi (poetry composed of distichs corresponding in measure, each consisting of a pair of rhymes), ghazal (sonnet), qat`ah, dobayti (couplets) and ruba'i (quatrains). Their themes as well as their renderings are sublime; notwithstanding, he did not know how to speak and write Persian (prose), and this needs extraordinary genius. At the same time to commend Iqbal as a poet is to belittle him, for he was a great reformer and a great freedom fighter as well. Though Iqbal's position and status as a freedom fighter and social reformer is very high, he cannot be regarded as a mere social reformer either. In the Indian subcontinent several Hindu and Muslim contemporaries of Iqbal were considered as social reformers, whose works are known and whose participation in the freedom struggle needs no introduction. Among the Muslims themselves there were great personalities like Mawlana Abu al-Kalam Azad, Mawlana Muhammad 'Ali, Mawlana Shawkat 'Ali and the late Muhammad `Ali Jinah. They also belonged to the same period and to the same generation and were great freedom fighters; but the greatness of Iqbal's work cannot be compared with any of them. It does not mean in any way to minimize the great importance and value that we attach to Mawlana Abu al-Kalam Azad, an eminent figure in his own right, or to Mawlana Muhammad 'Ali and Mawllna Shawkat `Ali (who were untiring Muslim freedom fighters who struggled for long years to drive out the British from their country), but Iqbal's case is different from all of them. Iqbal's problem was not the problem of India in particular, but his concern was for the whole Muslim world in general. In his mathnawi, Pas chi bayad kard ay aqwam-e Sharq, he addresses himself to the Eastern nations and it indicates that his keen eyes had an all-inclusive view of the entire Muslim world. He was not concerned with the problems of India. alone. Therefore, if I describe Iqbal as a social reformer, I will fail to cover his entire personality. I cannot find a proper term that can describe him. You can see that his personality, his greatness, his mind rich with ideas and the totality of his being, ellude the power of comprehension of people like us. To be true to ourselves we have to confess that we have been far away from Iqbal. As such this conference is one of the most useful things we have done so far. Even this is not enough. I would ask the honoured Minister of Higher Education and Culture and my brothers in universities to think about the possibilities of establishing foundations in Iqbal's memory, and to name university halls and cultural centres in our country after Iqbal. Iqbal belongs to this nation and this country, and one of his famous poems is dedicated to the people of Iran which begins with the following verse:

I am burning like a tulip's lamp on your path,
O youth of Iran, I swear by my own life and yours.



And he says:

The man is coming who shall break the chains of the slaves,
I have seen him through the cracks in the walls of your prison.



This poem also strengthens my belief as to why Iqbal could not visit Iran. He considered Iran as a prison and addressed the people living here in the way the prisoners are addressed. There are plenty of poems in Iqbal's collections which show his dissatisfaction with India at least the India of his own time. It was for this reason that he turned his attention to Iran so that the flame that was burning inside his heart could be converted into a bright blaze in Iran. He was waiting for a miracle to occur here: This is Iqbal's due that we owe to him, and we should always remember our indebtedness to him.


Iqbal and His Times

If we wish to understand Iqbal and the significance of his message, it is necessary for us to know the conditions of the Subcontinent during Iqbal's lifetime an epoch that culminated in Iqbal. Without this study we cannot understand the real meaning of Iqbal's message, the melody of his tone and the inner fire that kept him restless. The Subcontinent went through the hardest phase of its history during Iqbal's lifetime. Iqbal was born in 1877, that is, twenty years after the quelling of the Muslims' revolt against the English in 1857, when they inflicted a final blow upon the Islamic rule in the Subcontinent. A great revolutionary upsurge overtook the whole country and continued for several years, but four months (the middle of 1857) marked its culmination. The British used this opportunity for making an assault on Islam, which they were contemplating to make for the last seventy or eighty years, and they imagined to have uprooted Islam from the Indian soil.

They put an end to the Muslim rule that was breathing its last breaths. The only obstacle in their way of the total colonialization of the Indian subcontinent was the existence of the same rule, which they had succeeded in weakening during the course of time They liquidated its chief fighters and eminent personages in order to eradicate the deep-rooted Islamic civilization and to completely uproot this corpulent and old tree which was shorn of any power of resistance at that time, and to make India a part of the British empire. The year 1857 was the year of absolute victory for the British in India. After having officially annexed India to Britain and named their country as the Empire of Britain and India, the colonizing of India did not pose any problem, for India was treated henceforward as one of the provinces of the Great Britain. After that they took all possible precautions to crush every revivalist, nationalist br religious movement in that country. Their aim was to wipe out completely the Muslim population, as they knew it well that it were the Muslims who resisted them in India. They already had tested this. The Muslims fought with the English and their mercenaries, the Sikhs, who were serving them since the early nineteenth century. This was known to the English very well and to those who were acquainted with the Indian affairs, who used to tell them that the Muslims were their real enemies in India and that they were to be eliminated. From the year 1857, which was the year of their victory, an extremely oppressive and tyrannical plan was chalked out to suppress the Muslims. If we go into its detail it will take a long time. Many books were written on this subject. The Muslims were subjected to economic pressures as well as to cultural and social discriminations. Collectively, they were subjected to the worst kind of humiliations. As regard to the conditions of employment their declared policy was to recruit non-Muslims only.

The awqaf (endowments) that ran Islamic institutions and mosques were in large number and they were taken away. The Hindu merchants were motivated to lend money to the Muslims in order to seize their property in return for their debts. It was resolved that their relationship with the land be cut off and their sense of belonging to the land be uprooted.

This process continued for a long time. The Muslims were killed without reason and arrested for no fault of theirs. All such people who were suspected of carrying on any activities against the English were suppressed and eliminated ruthlessly. These conditions prevailed for several years. After one or two decades of this repression, which has no parallel anywhere in the world not in any of the colonized countries were the people suppressed so severely as the Indian Muslims ultimately some people began to think about the possible remedy for this situation; but of course the angry resistance against the English was not given up. India should never be forgetful of the fact that the Indian Muslims played the most vital part in the battle against the English. In fact it will be an act of thanklessness on the part of India to forget her indebtedness to the Muslims of India. The Muslims did never sit idle during the freedom struggle as well as during the great revolution that was brought about there.

During the years after the incident of 1857, when there was peace and calm everywhere, the militant Muslim elements were active in every nook and cranny. There were two courses of action open to them, that is, either the politico-cultural movement, or a purely cultural movement to meet the challenge threatening the position of the Muslims. One of the movements was led by the `ulama' and the other was initiated under the leadership of Sayyid Ahmad Khan. These two movements represented two cross currents opposing each other, and this is not the occasion to go into detail concerning them.

The `ulama' believed in waging war against the English. They resolved to boycott the English and their educational institutions and not to accept any grant from them.' The course followed by Sayyid Ahmad Khan was in opposite direction. He believed in having good relations with the Englishmen, benefiting from their institutions and making a compromise with them. Unfortunately both of the two movements, though opposed to each other, ended in disastrous consequences for the Muslims. The first one that was led by the eminent Indian `ulama', many among whom were distinguished historical figures. Their struggle was rightly guided and their ideology was also based on right thinking, but they tried to keep away the Indian Muslim community from acquiring the first and foremost thing they required and which could enable them to master modern developments in science and technology; for example, they did not include teaching of the English language in their school syllabi. Perhaps they were justified in doing so at that time, as the English language was to replace the Persian language, which had been the favourite language of the Muslims for centuries as well as the official language of the Subcontinent. They viewed English as an intruder. Anyhow, their opposition to the English language and their lack of interest in modern civilization, which at any rate had to govern the modes of the life of the people, kept the Muslim Ummah out of modern sciences along with their benefits and advantages, which were ultimately essential for the development of a society.

Sayyid Ahmad Khan's movement was more dangerous, and here I would like to express my considered opinion about him. (It is possible that some of the brothers may not agree with me.) Sayyid Ahmad Khan did not do anything positive for Islam and Indian Muslims. In my view, the movement initiated by Iqbal was a protest against the movement whose standard-bearer was Sayyid Ahmad Khan in India. Sayyid Ahmad Khan based his movement on friendly relations with the Englishmen under the pretext that after all the young generation of the Muslims had to be acquainted with the modern culture and that they could not afford to keep them alienated from and ignorant of the new currents. In his view it was essential to reconcile with the Englishmen so that the Muslims might not be mistreated by them and the Muslim men, women and children might not suffer due to this antagonism. He was very naive to believe that he could win the sympathy of the English and could soften the hearts of those seasoned and villainous politicians by being friendly and humble towards them.

As a consequence, the English spared Sayyid Ahmad Khan himself, his associates and the intellectuals around him whereas the Muslims in general remained exposed to all sorts of victimization till India won independence. Therefore, this policy of pleasing the Englishmen on the part of Sayyid Ahmad Khan proved to be harmful for the Muslims and brought disgrace and humiliation to them.


Iqbal and the State of Indian Muslims

More than anything what helps us to understand the significance and worth of Iqbal is the knowledge of the general conditions of the Muslims in those days. For the Muslim masses, intellectuals, scholars and all those who entered the broader fields of social. life could acquire knowledge, master modern science and gain degrees and positions, but were completely oblivious of their Islamic identity. Gradually the future hopes were lost for the colossal Muslim society of India that had the largest Muslim population in the world. (Even today we do not have a country that has such a big population of the Muslims as was at that time in Indian subcontinent.) A bleak future stared them in the face, they did not possess any awareness of .their Islamic identity, and had lost all hope. They suffered to such an extent that in the existing world and all its occurrences they saw nothing but bitterness, frustration and darkness in store for themselves.

A sense of inferiority had gripped the being of the Indian Muslims, and a deep sense of humiliation and weakness had become a part and parcel of their personality. They could not think of any way out of this predicament. At that time, when Iqbal returned from Europe, well-versed in modern Western culture, and while his contemporary intellectuals, his friends and even those who shared the same ideas with him always looked towards. the West and Western culture, they were of the view that Westernization of their individual lives and the assimilation of Western culture and the Western value system would add to their prestige and credibility. To be in the service of the British government which ruled India with an iron hand was considered to be an honour for the Muslims. The Hindus, who were several years ahead of the Muslims regarding the adoption of the Western culture and manners, and who were quicker than them in winning the confidence of the Englishmen had gained an advantageous position.

The Muslims must have been insulted and exploited by the Hindus also. Even the Sikhs, who were a very slim minority and had no religious or cultural traditions, considered it justified to oppress and insult the Muslims. Such was the state of the Muslim society during Iqbal's time.

The Lahore college where Iqbal received his education and obtained his bachelor's degree was bereft of all the signs of Islamic thinking which could inspire any future hope. The most respected book on Islam in those days was Sir Thomas Arnold's work entitled in Arabic al-Da'wah ila al-Islam (An Invitation to Islam), which has been lately translated into Persian also. The book was written by Sir Thomas Arnold during his tenure at the Lahore college. It is of course a good book and I do not want to condemn it, but the thing which is remarkable about this book is that he has made every effort to lessen the importance of Islamic jihad. The main theme around which the book revolves is that Islam advanced through da'wah (invitation) and not by means of the sword. These words sound to be good, but this English thinker has gone to the extent of considering the concept of Islamic jihad as a secondary issue. Sir Thomas is the person who is regarded as a sincere pro-Islamic writer and he was Iqbal's teacher also.

Here I would like to praise Iqbal's judiciousness in this regard. Despite his intimate relations with Sir Arnold, he was not unmindful of the political motives of his academic work. This point has been also emphasized by Mr. Jawid Iqbal in his biography of his father (one volume of which has been translated into Persian). He writes that Iqbal challenged his friend Sayyid Nadhir Niyazi, who believed Sir Thomas Arnold to be an Islamist. Questioning Arnold's credentials, he asked, `Do you judge him by al-Da'wah ila al-'Islam?', and answered himself, `He works for the British government.'

Iqbal further told the same friend that when he was in England Arnold asked him to translate Edward Browne's `Literary of History of Persia', but he declined to do it as he realized that it was written with political motives. Now you can see yourself how Iqbal evaluated Browne's book and compare it with the attitude of our writers who were Browne's friends and were proud of their relations with him. You can see how simple, naive and ignorant these people were, having no inkling of their political objectives, whereas Iqbal was perceptive and intelligent enough to understand the hidden implications of the colonialist politics in the works of Thomas Arnold and Edward Browne. This is an indication of Iqbal's greatness.

At that time the Muslims were in a very precarious condition. The British administration and its main institutions were under the direct control of the British, and the secondary and less important positions were held by the Hindus. The freedom movement that was first launched by the Muslims was grabbed by the Congress party, and that too a prejudiced Congress party. Later on the Indian National Congress rendered great service to the freedom struggle, but during those days it was dominated by communal prejudices. It was predominantly an anti-Islamic, pro-Hindu and anti-Muslim communalist organization. There were Westernized Muslim intellectuals who were infatuated with the Western values on the one hand, and on the other there were the poor Muslim masses, crushed under the burden of extreme poverty and drudgery.


Iqbal’s Awakening

The Muslim `ulama' and religious leaders were isolated from the freedom movement (after their initial defeat) and were alienated from it (except those who were in the vanguard of the movement, leaders like Mawlana Muhammad `Ali). Political isolation and economic deprivation ruled supreme. The Muslims were reduced to the state of being a superfluous part of the Indian society, without any guiding star on the horizon. In such crucial moments Iqbal kindled the torch of egohood. Of course, India was no exception; the above mentioned conditions prevailed throughout the Muslim world. It was for the very same reason that Iqbal speaks about the whole Islamic world. Iqbal's day to day life in the city of Lahore in the colonized subcontinent of India led him to directly experience the pains and hardships of life. It was at this juncture that Iqbal raised the banner of his revolt. His was a cultural, political and revolutionary movement. The first thing that was necessary for Iqbal to do was to make the Indian society aware of its Islamic identity, Islamic ego and the Islamic personality, or rather the human dimension of its personality. He asks the people as to why they were complacent, why they were forgetful and why they had abandoned their real selves. He asks them to regain their Islamic and human identity. This was the first message delivered by Iqbal. But, could he succeed in awakening the nation of several hundreds of millions that had been subjected to severe exploitation and humiliation for a long time. A nation that was divested of the capacity to understand, to know and to hope against hope was now asked to assert existence and recover its identity as soon as possible. It was almost an impossible task, very difficult to be realized. In my humble opinion no one could convey this message in a better way than Iqbal did. With a view to attain this end Iqbal evolved his philosophy of the self (hhudi). The philosophy of egohood in the sense of subjective philosophical views is not the subject of our discussion. The conception of ego which has human and social implications, was presented philosophically so that it could fit in a philosophical tradition. As Iqbal wished to make it the central theme of his poems, ghazals, and mathnawts, this notion required to be based on a sound philosophical outlook. Iqbal conceived ego as the source of feeling and knowing one's individuality through contemplation, introspection, self-cognition and self-realization. He explained this conception in philosophical terms.

In my view, in the beginning the idea of ego might have occurred to Iqbal as a revolutionary idea, and afterwards he made an attempt to philosophize it. It may be argued that ego is the same thing that was the most needed in the Indian society, and in general was missing in the entire Muslim world as well. In spite of having an Islamic value system the Muslim peoples had become unmindful of it, and eagerly surrendered themselves to an alien system with full faith. It was, therefore, necessary for them to return to their own selves, that is, to the Islamic value system. In this very sense Iqbal was trying to pursue 'it as a goal. Such a sociological concept could not be impressed on the minds of people without being expressed in a philosophical manner. Iqbal had to present it philosophically.

As said above, the idea of selfhood or ego at first was conceived by Iqbal as a sociological and revolutionary notion. In due course, after having witnessed the signs of degeneration and loss of self identity of the Eastern nations, especially the Muslims, and after examining its causes, this idea became permanent and deeply rooted in his being. Afterwards he sought to provide a philosophical and subjective ground to it, and based this notion on a general conception of the self, something similar to the conception of existence as evolved by our philosophers an essence which is shared by all beings but needs to be interpreted philosophically. Of course, wujud (existence) is something different from khudi (ego), and to interpret it as existence, as is done by some of the persons who have written commentaries on Iqbal's poems, is a great blunder in my view. The notion of unity in plurality and plurality in unity, which has been recurrently used in his Asrar-e khudi (The Secrets of the Self), is different from the metaphysical conception of unity in plurality and plurality in unity as interpreted by Mulla Sadra and others. It is altogether a different category. What Iqbal meant to refer to by this notion had cent per cent human and social connotation. When I say it is social, I do not mean that it is not applicable to individual. Why not? Ego needs to be strengthened in an individual. But this very egohood of the ego of an individual and the strengthening of the personality of the ego have social implications in Islamic framework. Unless the personality of the (individual) ego is strengthened, a strong and stable society in its real sense cannot come into existence. The meaning of the ego is different from that of the existence. At the first instance he speaks in the manner of mystics about the generality and the extent of the concept of self. The world of being is actualized through the manifestations of the ego. Each one of the phenomena of the universe is a manifestation of a particular aspect of the self. Of course, some of the themes that I have described in my own words have been differently presented by Iqbal in the headings of his poems. There are some other themes that are expressed far more beautifully in his poetry than their paraphrasing by Iqbal himself in the headings of certain poems.

The ideas, themselves produced by the self-consciousness, are the manifestations of the ego in every being. The affirmation of one's ego is also an affirmation of others. When the presence of the ego in a human being is posited, it automatically posits the presence of egoes other than one's own. Therefore there is self as well as the non-self, that is, the existence of other is also posited. Hence it may be inferred that the whole universe is contained as a possibility in the self. The ego is the source of hostility also. There are various selves that are at war with one another. This struggle, this perpetual conflict brings the world into existence. It is the ego which is responsible for the selection of the fittest and its survival as well. So often thousands of selves are sacrificed for the sake of one higher self. The concept of ego is a graded one and its grades vary in intensity and weakness. The degree of intensity and weakness of the ego in each one of the beings is the factor which determines their strength and firmness. In this context he cites the examples of various entities such as the drop, the wine, the goblet, the cup-bearer, the mountain, the desert, the wave, the sea, the light, the eye, the verdure, the candle, the silence, the candle-bearer, the gem, the earth, the moon, the star, the sun, the tree, etc. Each one of them is measured by the intensity of its ego; for instance, a drop has a particular strength of ego, while a stream has a different strength of ego. Similarly a gem on which an image can be engraved possesses an ego strength different from that of a stone on which no image can be engraved. Finite ego is never absolute. It always refers to a graded essence, which is present in things and human individuals, as well as in cosmic elements in diverse measures. He concludes this theme with the following verse:

When ego embraces Elan Vital,
The stream of life is transformed into an ocean.



Afterwards he expounds his views about the pursuit of ideals and aspirations, something which was most wanting in the Islamic world in those days. It means that the Muslims did not have any purpose in life. They did not have any high aspirations either. Their ambitions were confined to day to day life. He holds the view that the human life is nothing without purpose and aim. The ego attains selfhood through moving towards the desired ideals:

`Verily the life is faith and jihad' (striving).


He has expressed the same idea in a very comprehensive, profound, subtle and elegant way in his poetry. To desire for something and to strive unceasingly for attaining it is called purposiveness, without which life becomes synonymous with death.

It is desire that makes the universe throb with life. Nature is the shell and desire is the pearl. The heart which is incapable of cherishing desires is a bird with broken wings, unable to fly. It is aspiration which strengthens the life of the self, and transforms it into a restless sea eversurging. It is the joy of viewing that gives vision to the viewing eye. It is the fun of walking that gives feet to the pheasant. It is the effort to sing that is instrumental in endowing the nightingale's beak with melody. It is the piper's hands and the lips that breathe musical notes into reed, which was nothing but a mere straw in the reed bed.

Science, culture, poetry, literature, law, everything is the product of human aspirations actualized through continuous struggle. Hence he says:

Our lives are sustained by the ideals we create for ourselves,
Our being is illuminated by the rays of our aspirations.



He reiterates the same theme in another verse:

Man is hot-blooded due to his burning passions,
This clay glows with the light of aspirations.



He considers love and passion essential for human society, and individual man, for it strengthens the individual as well as the social ego. He holds that the ego of an individual and the society cannot be strengthened without love. It is essential that the Islamic millah and all other human beings who desire to strengthen their selves should kindle the fire of love in their breasts. It is remarkable that he himself determines an object of love, a point around which the Muslim Ummah has to rally. It is at this juncture that one feels how intelligently this man of awareness and insight comprehended the necessity of the unity of the Muslim world. His quest for the rallying point led him to believe that the love of the Prophet Muhammad al-Mustafa was the only passion that could motivate and rally the Muslim Ummah around a new consciousness:

The luminous point that is called the ego,
Keeps glowing the spark of life in our corporeal body.
Through love it becomes more lasting,
More alive, more fervent, and more luminous.
Through love its essence is blazed up,
And its hidden treasures are evolved.
The ego acquires fire from love,
And learns how to illuminate the universe with this fire.
It is love that brings peace as well as conflict to the world.
Love is the Water of life as well as the well-tempered sword.
Learn the art of being a lover and aspire for loveliness,
Strive to attain the eyes of Noah and aspire for Job's heart.
Discover alchemy in a handful of mud.
And kiss the threshold of sublimity.



Subsequently he tells us as to who that beloved whom the Muslims should love devotedly is:

The beloved is hidden in thy heart.
If thou art gifted with eyes, come,
I will show thee his face,
His lovers are lovelier than all the beloveds of the world,
More beautiful, more elegant and more loveable.
Through his love the heart gains strength,
And the earth attains the exalted status of the Pleiades.
The land of Najd was made vigilant ingenious through his grace,
In a state of ecstasy it flew higher than the heavens.

The heart of the Muslim in the seat of al-Mustafa.
Whatever respect we command is due to his name.
Mount Sinai is nothing but dust that arose from his House,
His parlour is sacred even for the Ka'bah.
The mat is grateful to him that he prefers to sleep on it,
The Taq-e Kisra is trampled under the feet of his Ummah.
He retired to the privacy of the Cave of Hira ;
And brought forth a nation, a constitution and a government,
Night after night passed by his bedside finding him awake,
So that his people could rest on the throne of Khusrow.



He gives an account of the Prophet and his high qualities. Not only here alone, but throughout his poetical works we can see an unceasing stream of his love for the Prophet gushing out wave after wave.

A contemporary Pakistani scholar has written a book about Iqbal, entitled Iqbal dar rah-e Mawlawi (Iqbal on the Path of Mawlawi), in which he states that whenever a poem that contained the Prophet's sacred name was recited in Iqbal's presence spontaneously tears flowed from his eyes. Indeed he passionately loved the Prophet. Iqbal has made out a very important point. Where can the world of Islam find a personage more popular and dearer than the Prophet of Islam? His personality is the focal point of the unity of the Islamic world. Iqbal, while narrating the story of the daughter of Hatim al-Tai, says that in one of the battles the daughter of Hatim al-Tai was taken captive and brought in the presence of the Prophet. His feet were chained and her head and body were bare. The disrespect showed to the daughter of a great and generous person like Hatim was so shocking that the Prophet took out his cloak and flung it towards her so that she might cover herself. Iqbal concludes this story with the following verses:

We are more naked than the Lady of al-Ta’i.
We are stripped of our robe of honour before the nations.
He is the source of our credibility on the Day of Judgement,
In this world, too, it is he whose love covers our faults.
We, who do not recognize any boundaries and nationalities,
Like vision from the two eyes, are one in reality.
We may belong to Hijaz, Egypt or Iran,
But we are the dew-drops of the same laughing dawn.
The eyes of the keeper of the tavern of Bathd' have intoxicated us,
We are like, the goblet full to the brim with this wine,
Like a hundred-leaf flower we smell alike,
For it is he who breathes life into this bouquet, and he is one.



On so many occasions Iqbal has composed verses expressing his deep love for the Prophet that it is not possible to quote all of them here.

In Asrar-e khudi (The Secrets of the Self) he tries to awaken the sense of selfhood, that is, the sense of human identity in the individual as well as the society. A separate section in `The Secrets of the Self' deals with the idea that the selfhood is weakened by entreating. When an individual or a nation stretches its hands in need before others, this act weakens the individuality of a person or the nation and consequently the process of deterioration sets in.

As a sequal to the problem of ego Iqbal elucidates the problem of selflessness. While discussing the problem of the self, the notion of the strengthening an individual's identity should not be .interpreted in the sense of imprisoning one's being within the walls constructed around the self and living in isolation, cut off from other human beings as independent egoes. Neither it means that one should lose his identity among other selves in the society. Rather, an individual should live in close relationship with the society: This is the real meaning of the selflessness. The book Rumuz-e bikhudi (The Secrets of the Selflessness) is the second book of Iqbal that was composed and printed after Asrar-e khudi and is illustrative of Iqbal's ideas about the Islamic system. Iqbal's ideas about establishing an Islamic order are more ` elaborate and clearer in Rumuz-e bikhudi than any other of his works. On the whole, the problems elucidated in Rumuz-e bikhudi are among the issues relevant to the establishment of an Islamic society and ought to be taken into consideration.


Iqbal on Tawhid

While going through the themes of the secrets of the selflessness, we notice that Iqbal paid attention exactly to the same questions that are predominant in our Islamic society today. The foremost among the most exciting ideas of Iqbal is his emphasis on the mission of the followers of tawhid. He believed that the Muslims and the Islamic Ummah are bound to spread the message of Islam and they should not rest unless they perform this duty.

It would be interesting, at this juncture, to quote a few selected verses of Iqbal in this regard. In these verses he says that the formation of an Islamic society and the emergence of an Islamic Ummah in this world have not been a simple matter. The world had to wait for ages and history had to undergo countless experiments in order to reach the conception of tawhid and to arrive at a stage where an Ummah inspired with the ideal of tawhid and .a people faithfully following Islamic thought could have evolved:

This ancient body called the world Is constituted by the intermixing of the mother elements.
A hundred reed-beds were cultivated to produce a single melody;
A hundred gardens bled for ages to make a tulip bloom;
Thousand and thousand images were conceived, carved, and erased So that thine image could be engraved on the tablet of being.
Countless whimpers and tears were sown and nurtured in the soul.
To let a prayer-call blossom out.
Since ages the world was at war with the noble souls,
And it favoured the worshippers of false gods.
At last the seed of faith was implanted in the earth,
And the word of tawhid found expression through thy lips.
The centre of the cycles of the universe is La ilah;
The ultimate end of all action in the world is La ilah.
It is the force that keeps the heavens rotating,
It is what gives the sun its light and life,
It is the force that gives birth to pearls in the ocean's womb,
And keeps the waves surging and moving all the time.
Its morning breeze transforms the soil into flower,
Its fire breathes a nightingale's song into a handful of feathers;
Its flame runs through the veins of the vinegrape;
Its heat makes the goblet-clay to glow as a spark;
Its tunes are asleep within the strings of being Waiting for thy plectrum to fill the air with music.
Thine existence shalt vibrate with a hundred songs
Arise and strike thy plectrum at its strings.
As takbir is the secret of thine existence,
The purpose of thy creation is to preserve and spread the message of La ilah.
Unless the world echoes with the vibrations of the call of Truth,
If really a Muslim, thou shalt not rest.
Hast thou not read the verse in the Mother of books
That bestowed upon thee the title of the Just Ummah?
Thou art the lustre of the visage of time,
Thou art made witness to the deeds of all the nations;
Extend thine invitation to all who are punctilious.
Thou hast to disseminate the treasures of the knowledge of the Ummi,
Whose words were not polluted with lust of any kind,
Whose words interpreted the meaning of the verse: "Whose comrade erreth not, nor is deceived"
He washed the tunics of his gardens tulips clean And purified them from all impurities.



After elucidating the all-embracing nature of Islamic teachings (which has been done a hundred times in his work), Iqbal addresses the Ummah of tawhid declaring that they are the standard-bearers of Islam, and appeals to them to march forward with the purpose of delivering the message of Islam to the world. Subsequently he asks them to break into pieces the new idol carved by the swindlers of the West. What is this new idol?

Thou who hast the Book under thine arms
Should step forward in the arena of action.
The human mind is always after carving a new idol;
Man's quest for a new image has not ceased in any age,
Again he has rebuilt the temple of Adhar (the idol-maker),
And has moulded a god, newer than others,
Whose joy lies in shedding the blood of his worshippers.
His are numerous names: colour, country and race.


It is implied in these verses that nationalism, racialism and narrow patriotism draw boundaries to isolate peoples and countries. These imprisoned loyalties cause wars between one nation and another in the name of nationality, community, race and colour:

Humanity is being sacrificed like a sheep At the foot of the unholy idol.
Thou, who hast drunk from the goblet of Khalil (the idol-breaker), Thy veins are throbbing with the wine of the passion of Khalil.
Thou hast to strike the sword of "nothing exists except Him"
Into falsehood disguised as truth.
Let thy face shine on the dark horizons of time,
And spread the perfect message that has been revealed to thee.



Iqbal, the Ummah and Prophethood

Iqbal's idea of propagating the message of Islam and breaking all the artificial boundaries drawn to divide nations leads him to expound certain other notions that are predominant in his philosophy of bikhudi (selflessness), that is, the unification of the individual with the society and his absorption therein. According to him nubuwwah (prophethood) is the principal source of the organization of the Ummah. It does not mean that a millah is formed by the merely gathering together of many individuals. A particular mode of thinking and an ideology is essential in order to weave different threads together to form the fabric of a nation. For this purpose the most fundamental and the best of all the ideologies is the one that was propounded through nubuwwah, the prophetic mission, and it was propounded by the messengers of God. This is the best of all the foundation-stones upon which a nation is built. This mode of thinking imparts reasoning, faith, discipline and perfection to a nation.

Another concept upon which Iqbal's system of thought rests is the negation of servitude-servitude to the demigods sitting on the throne and standing at the altar.

Man worshipped man in the world.
He lived as a non-entity, as a non-being and as a subordinate
Under the heavy yoke of the Khusrows and the Qaysars.
And his neck, his hands and his feet were chained;
The Popes and the priests and the kings and the lords
A hundred hunters after a single prey!
Both the king and the priest levied taxes on his devastated harvest.



Whatever was left after paying taxes to the King's officials was grabbed by the tax collectors of the Pope. This had been a customary practice all over the world, as Iqbal says:

Bishop, in the name of alloting apartments in the Paradise,
Set a trap in the church to catch him;
The Brahmin plucked the best roses of his garden;
The Magi's children made up their fire by adding his harvest to it ;
His human qualities were debased by slavery.
At last came the Trustworthy, who restored the lost rights,
And entrusted the throne of the Khaqans to the slaves.



Iqbal's poetry and philosophy aimed at humanizing the world are very rich in the themes of human and social significance, such as the Divine mission of the Prophet of Islam, the equality of man, the Quranic doctrine of judging a person according to his taqwa (piety):

The noblest of you in the sight of Allah is the best in taqwa,

and many other similar issues that are indicative of his concern for higher values and the service of mankind. We cannot propagate these ideas in our country without making popular and public the works of Iqbal. This is a task to be carried out in Iran and Pakistan as well as in the countries where people understand Persian and where people are prepared to learn the language.


Iqbal: Between East and West

The poetry of Iqbal, the major part of which is in Persian, needs wider circulation. Out of the fifteen thousand couplets composed by him nine thousand are in the Persian language. This shows that his works in Urdu are fewer than those in Persian. Rather it can be said that the best and the finest part of his poetry is in our language, and, therefore, we are obliged to devote best of our energies to understand it. For the first time when I read Iqbal's poetry I felt that many of his verses could be understood only with the help of detailed explanatory notes and comments, and regretfully I could find such commentaries nowhere. It is essential to compile such annotated editions. Even the Persian speaking people are in need of such commentaries in order to fully grasp the ideas and themes dealt with by Iqbal. Today the major part of Iqbal's teaching directly concerns us, and some part of it is also relevant to the world that has not gone our way so far and has to understand it in the same manner as we did.

Our people have translated into action his doctrine of the selfhood. They have invigorated it and have brought it into action in the world of actuality. Now our people do not have to be asked to recover their selfhood. Today we are perfectly aware of being on our feet. We are proud of our culture and our cultural heritage, and are confident that we can develop it further on the basis of our ideology and thought. Of course for a long time we were made to depend upon others regarding the material aspect of our life, but we are trying to get rid of these foreign fetters gradually and this process is going on. The Muslim peoples are anyhow in need of comprehending the meaning of selfhood; especially the eminent Muslims, whether they are politically active or culturally creative, need to embrace Iqbal's message. They have to realize that Islam in itself, in its essence and in its nature, possesses the richest potentialities of conducting the affairs of the individual lives and human societies, and does not need to look towards others. We do not advocate for summarily dismissing other cultures and close our doors to them. We should assimilate them, but in the manner as a living body absorbs the elements that are essential for its life, and not like a dead and unconscious body which is injected by others whatever they desire to inject into it. We have the capacity of assimilating from other cultures whatever is relevant to us. As Iqbal has said repeatedly, we can learn the modern science and philosophy from the West, but the ardour and zest for life can never be borrowed from others:

Wisdom we have learnt from the teachings of the Western thinkers.
Ardour for life we have acquired in the company of men of insight.



It means that the Western society and culture is wanting in ardour and fervour, and Iqbal was quicker than any other person in perceiving this phenomenon. He could anticipate the dangers inherent in the Western civilization and its materialistic culture, and warned the people in advance that it was devoid of the spiritual elements essential for human welfare. Fortunately, today the consciousness of selfhood and Islamic identity is abounding in our country among the people. Our policy based on the principle of "Neither the East nor the West" is in conformity with what Iqbal advised and wished to be pursued. Our policy of self-reliance is identical with Iqbal's views. We, in our love for the Prophet, in our commitment to the Quran, in our emphasis on learning the Quran, and in our conviction that the Quran and Islam are to be made the basis of all the revolutions and movements, are exactly following the path that was shown to us by Iqbal. At that time, nobody was attentive enough to pay heed to Iqbal's counsel. In those days there were not many people who could understand Iqbal's message and his language. Iqbal's books are replete with complaints and remonstrances as to why people do not understand his message and look towards the West for guidance. In his introduction to Rumuz-e bikhudi also he remonstrates with the Islamic Ummah.

Thou Overt appointed to be the seal of all nations;
Thou Overt destined to be the end of all the beginnings;
Thine `ulama' were made equal to prophets;
Thy martyred comrades could breathe life into the hearts.
Why art thine eyes enchanted by the beauty of the church?
Why host thou fallen away from the path of the Holy Ka'bah?
Believe me. The dustof thy street rises to form heavenly spheres;
O thy visage attracts the eyes of the entire world.
Why art thou rising and falling restlessly life a wave?
What is that spectacle thou art going to behold?
Learn the secret of lining passionately on your own from the moth;
Build thy nest amidst the tongues of flames
Kindle the fire of lone from within thy soul;
Restore thy bond with the spirit of al-Mustafa.
I have left the company of the church-Boers,
To see to it that the veil is raised from thy face.
O my comrade, thou art bewitched by the charm of others
And singing odes to praise golden locks and rosy cheeks.



Here, by the epithet hamnawa (comrade), Iqbal means to refer to his contemporaries and those who were of late introduced to the Western culture and were intoxicated with the Western value system, He compares their attitude with that of his own:

He rubs his forehead at the foot of the Saqi,
He is lost in the story of the Magi's children,
While I bleed, struck by the crescent of thine eyebrows,
Happy that my blood is soaked in the dust of thy street.
My art has been over and above eulogizing worldly lords;
My head never bowed before imperial courts.



He reminds the Muslim Ummah that it has never been his custom to sing praises, but he eulogized her so passionately because of his deep love for Islam:

Poetry bestowed upon me ability to make a mirror out of words,
And it has freed me from asking Alexander's favour.
I hate to be burdened by the favours of others
My lips are pursed and hands shut like a bud in the garden.



After giving free vent to his feeling of disdain and indifference to the worldly attainments, Iqbal, who never humbled himself by prostrating before anybody, kneels down on his knees in front of the Muslim Ummah, and begs them to realize their own worth and pay heed to the words of the Quran:

At thy door my soul is bleeding to beg a small favour of thee,
In return it offers thee all her ardour and pathos.
A river comes down trickling from the blue sky,
Its water is distilled through my burning heart,
And I direct its course through channels thinner than rivulets,
To make it steadily flow and water thine orchard.



This was just a brief account and a short glimpse of our dear Iqbal's personality, who was undoubtedly a bright star on the horizon of the East. We hope that we shall acknowledge our indebtedness to him and would be able to recompense for the delay made by our people in recognizing Iqbal's worth during the span of last forty, fifty years. I request the researchers, poets, orators, writers, publishers, the government organizations, the Ministry of Culture and Advanced Learning, the Ministry of Education and Training and the Ministry of Islamic Guidance, each of them, to do their best to reintroduce and revive the spirit of Iqbal in the manner befitting his memory. I propose that his poetry and his writings be reproduced and compiled in the form of books, and his poetical works like Asrar-e khudi (The Secrets of the Self), Rumuz-e bikhudi (The Mysteries of Selflessness), Gulshan-e raz (Garden of Mystery), Jawid nameh (Pilgrimage to Eternity), etc. be reprinted and each of them published separately. This work has been done in Pakistan to some extent, but the people of Pakistan cannot be fully benefited from those ideas as today the Persian language is not in currency there as in the past. I wish this gap also to be filled. It is further hoped that our Pakistani brothers present in this meeting as well as the writers of the Indian subcontinent realize their responsibility and rise to the occasion to resist the vicious policies of the past governments regarding the Persian language, which possesses great treasures of Islamic culture and in which the major part of Islamic culture is preserved. They should give currency to this language in the Subcontinent where there are great numbers of Muslims; especially in Pakistan this work needs to be done with a sense of urgency.

In our own country also the publication of Iqbal's books should be carried out on a large scale and the artists should illustrate Iqbal's works with suitable paintings, the musicians should sing his poems set in popular tunes in order to render them effectively and bring to the tongues of the young and the old. I hope that God Almighty will enable us to repay the debt that the Muslim Ummah owes to him.

Wa al-salam alaykum wa rahmat Allah wa barakatuh.

– THE END –

* * *

--